WelcomeReader MailAwardsSAQImagesBelow the RimNovember 4, 2008November 2, 2008Octber 24, 2008October 12, 2008October 10, 2008October 4, 2008September 26, 2008September 21, 2008September 13, 2008September 9, 2008August 5, 2008July 13, 2008July 12, 2008June 13, 2008June 10, 2008May 10, 2008March 30, 2008March 21, 2008March 17, 2008March 5, 2008February 28, 2008February 21, 2008January 27, 2008January 19, 2008January 8, 2008January 7, 2008January 1, 2008December 31, 2007December 11, 2007December 10, 2007November 20, 2007November 4, 2007October 19, 2007October 11, 2007Sep 30, 2007Sept 29, 2007Sep 17, 2007 part ISep 17, 2007 part IIAugust 13, 2007July 6, 2007April 3, 2007March 25, 2007March(n) ChroniclesMarch 1, 2007February 28, 2007February 24, 2007Februray 4, 2007January 14, 2007January 9, 2007January 2, 2007December 22, 2006December 4, 2006November 24, 2006November 18, 2006November 11, 2006October 21, 2006October 13, 2006October 7, 2006October 1, 2006Sept 13, 2006August 22, 2006June 17, 2006June 12, 2006June 11, 2006March 29, 2006March 17, 2006March 7, 2006February 18, 2006February 5, 2006February 4, 2006January 8, 2006January 7, 2006January 1, 2006December 11, 2005November 27, 2005November 11, 2005November 4, 2005October 28, 2005October 18, 2005October 14, 2005Sept 29, 2005Sept 23, 2005August 26, 2005August 21, 2005Jan 29, 2005Jan 24, 2005Jan 11, 2005Jan 3, 2005Download2004 Back Issues

 

Nothing But Iron: Poor Eagle

by Steven R. Lagman, M.D., C.A.S.W.

January 8, 2006

First I should explain Poor Eagle, otherwise a whole bunch of people with think it’s some kind of inside joke shared only by elite NBI readers. Truth is, you are all elite. Auburn’s battle cry is War Eagle. War rhymes with poor. Get it? Next question: Why do the Auburn Tigers use War Eagle as a battle cry? It is true that Auburn’s mascot is a tiger, and not an eagle or even a politically inappropriate native American tribe, so this doesn’t make sense, except that it is definitely more sophisticated to walk by an Auburn tailgating buddy and say War Eagle, than it is to roar.

Somebody asked me to explain why Wisconsin, after beating Auburn in the Really Good Credit Card Bowl, was ranked No. 15, just behind No. 14 Auburn in the final USA Today and AP polls of the season. At first glance this looks to be a real Soduku, but I, as an expert amateur sportswriter have not one, but several answers, or at least responses to the apparent conundrum: 1) This was news to me. It did not occur to me to look at the final rankings, because it did not occur to me that it mattered. 2) Contrary to common misconception, a higher poll standing does not indicate a better team. It indicates a more popular team. Remember, polls are generated by voters. It is often not enough to conclusively beat the higher-ranked team on an actual playing field; a team must campaign effectively as well. I believe that Auburn had a stronger platform–vote for us and we will control inflation, or something like that. 3) How many times have we seen teams move down in the polls after winning or up in the polls after a bye week? 4) We tolerate and sometimes even embrace the so-called logic of a rating system based on computer data and voters’ whims to select the two teams to receive berths in a one-game playoff for the national championship. Why wouldn’t Wisconsin be ranked worse than Auburn? 5) 24-10. 6) 24-10. 7) 24-10.

Weeks ago, when Wisconsin suffered yet another regular-season-ending loss to Iowa, it seemed that the perfect ending had eluded Barry Alvarez. We know now that I made that proclamation prematurely. Sometimes the perfect ending sneaks up on you. I talked to a couple Cap One fans who had reluctantly returned from Florida’s 80-degree temperatures. They described what we Rose Bowl veterans know as Bruin syndrome–a pungent, impenetrable arrogance that radiates from groups of fans whose allegiance is to the favored team. It is treatable only by a good ass whoopin’. Auburn fans thought it a foregone conclusion that the game would be a rout. They were right.

Brian Calhoun’s jukes and bursts, en route to a 213-yard day, inspired the invention of a new phrase: went video, as in Calhoun went video on that linebacker. It’s a reference to some of the crazy moves I have seen watching players in my kids’ Playstation football games. Calhoun got the MVP, but it could have easily gone to John Stocco or Brandon Williams or the entire Wisconsin defense, which played as if its once-patchwork defense had, in a month’s time, become a Kevlar vest. Stocco was as poised under pressure as I have ever seen him. Williams was Williams.

Word is that we have shared in Calhoun’s glory for the last time. My son Patrick says there are too many good running backs flooding the market from Calhoun to leave early, but Patrick is 15. He understands economics in the context of $8 dollar movie tickets. Add six decimal places, and the answer comes into clear focus. Like Devin Harris before him, Calhoun can’t afford to stay in school. What is not clear, with Booker Stanley’s purported off-field troubles, is who will assume this critical role next year. We’ll worry about that after basketball season.

Offensive tackle Joe Thomas won’t have the option of coming out early. While that could be good news for the Badgers, who will likely get him back next year after he rehabs his ACL injury, what a disappointment it must be for Thomas, who suffered the injury while filling in on defense. I hope he knows how much we fans appreciate his willingness to help his team.

Don’t confuse my elation over Wisconsin’s defeat of Auburn with my condoning of bowl game nonsense in general. Here are two letters I sent Sports Illustrated. I wrote two because I couldn’t decide which one they would like better. Neither has a snowball’s chance in Madison of being published, so I share them with you in this exclusive NBI offering:

Letter 1:

In the blinding bliss of this week's fortuitous college football match-ups, let's remember that the biggest winners are not the Longhorns and the biggest losers are not the Trojans. No, the biggest winners are the sponsors of the Bowl Championship Series. The biggest losers are the fans and players of Division I college football, which, in its intractable condition of playoff denial, has yet to elucidate a true champion.

Letter 2:

Texas might be the best team in the country, but I can't prove that because there are excellent teams that never got a chance to prove otherwise. What can be said with certainty is that the sponsors of the Bowl Championship Series have never fared better. Congratulations to these sponsors on a great season.

In case you wonder about snowball’s chances in Madison these days, just about every flake of December’s white-for-a-change Christmas is gone. It melted the week after New Years, just like USC’s unbeaten streak.

I told myself I would boycott the Rose Bowl on principle, proving that I am an unprincipled liar. Despite its illegitimate origins, the match-up was too good to ignore. I admit, I was entertained. I was thrilled. I was stunned. At times I was stunned by the sheer boneheadedness of the events: 1) Reggie Bush’s foiled desperation lateral, 2) Coach Pete Carroll’s (arrogant?) fourth-down try late in the fourth quarter, 3) USC burning its final time out on Texas’s two-point conversion.

Dumbest of all was losing quarterback Matt Leinert’s post-game comment: "I still think we're a better football team." Note to Matt: Are not. Are not. I have said it many times before, but it bears repeating: The beauty of sports is that the team with the most points is the better team. That’s by definition. It’s irrefutable. At least this holds when people of supposed higher learning don’t inhibit the logical process of opponents actually playing one and other.

Dumb wasn’t exclusive to the Rose Bowl, I watched the interview with Capital One big shot, Joe Bill Whatshisname (name changed to protect the reputation of sportswriters who fail to take good notes). The interviewer asked what it means for Capital One to host this game. Joe Bill had the audacity to say, "It’s not about what we get out of it, but what we give back to the community." Cough-bullshit-cough. Gesundheit. If any of you believe that, I have some soon-to-be very valuable autographed photos of Mike Sherman for your investment portfolios. I have got to give credit to Whathisname; he actually said this with a straight face. Only the dollar signs flashing in his eyeballs betrayed his true motivations.

Thank you, Nittany Lions, for beating Florida State in the Orange Bowl. The Seminoles, who have the most annoying repetitive chant this side of Hail to the Victors, deserved a loss for lack of creativity and originality. Nice job, Joe Pa. I was one who thought your program was washed up. Thanks for proving me wrong. It’s worth it.

I have more opinions on football–thoughts on Sherman’s firing, Favre’s retiring, Bielemma’s new role, Ferentz’s candidacy. Ferentz gets his own article (see Beam Him Up, Scotty). Briefly, I’ll just say that Favre, if healthy, will struggle mightily with spectator status. He’s like the never-surrender armless, soon-to-be-legless, Black Knight in the Monty Python movie (assist Walter Dewey, I think). It’s only a flesh wound.

In the interest of preventing sleep deprivation, I’ll allow basketball season its inevitable encroachment . . .

The best thing about Wisconsin beating Michigan State in Sunday’s game at the Kohl Center,

besides enjoying the disgusted look on Tom Izzo’s face, is the comfort I get knowing the Badgers are not likely to take the win out of context. Winning this game and beating Iowa in the season opener are not about national rankings or claims of frontrunner status in the Big Ten race. In fact the meaning of these victories won’t be known until the end of the season, when they can be considered as small components of a mission that will have been successful or not successful. Ryan teaches that concept well. No doubt his players know that a long season in a tough conference awaits them.

Disclaimers given, I do like the way this Wisconsin team is growing. A few rough spots persist–like wayward free throw shooting and occasional defensive lapses, but these are beginning to be overshadowed by a toughness, intensity, confidence and cohesiveness that, to outsiders, must seem strange for a team with four new starters and a youthful cast of key reservists like Michael Flowers, Greg Stiemsma, Marcus Landry and Joe Krabbenhoft. Yeah, it is early, but I like our chances.

____________

Nothing But Iron is an amateur sports column. ©2006 DrTM Enterprises. All rights reserved.





|Welcome| |Reader Mail| |Awards| |SAQ| |Images| |Below the Rim| |November 4, 2008| |November 2, 2008| |Octber 24, 2008| |October 12, 2008| |October 10, 2008| |October 4, 2008| |September 26, 2008| |September 21, 2008| |September 13, 2008| |September 9, 2008| |August 5, 2008| |July 13, 2008| |July 12, 2008| |June 13, 2008| |June 10, 2008| |May 10, 2008| |March 30, 2008| |March 21, 2008| |March 17, 2008| |March 5, 2008| |February 28, 2008| |February 21, 2008| |January 27, 2008| |January 19, 2008| |January 8, 2008| |January 7, 2008| |January 1, 2008| |December 31, 2007| |December 11, 2007| |December 10, 2007| |November 20, 2007| |November 4, 2007| |October 19, 2007| |October 11, 2007| |Sep 30, 2007| |Sept 29, 2007| |Sep 17, 2007 part I| |Sep 17, 2007 part II| |August 13, 2007| |July 6, 2007| |April 3, 2007| |March 25, 2007| |March(n) Chronicles| |March 1, 2007| |February 28, 2007| |February 24, 2007| |Februray 4, 2007| |January 14, 2007| |January 9, 2007| |January 2, 2007| |December 22, 2006| |December 4, 2006| |November 24, 2006| |November 18, 2006| |November 11, 2006| |October 21, 2006| |October 13, 2006| |October 7, 2006| |October 1, 2006| |Sept 13, 2006| |August 22, 2006| |June 17, 2006| |June 12, 2006| |June 11, 2006| |March 29, 2006| |March 17, 2006| |March 7, 2006| |February 18, 2006| |February 5, 2006| |February 4, 2006| |January 8, 2006| |January 7, 2006| |January 1, 2006| |December 11, 2005| |November 27, 2005| |November 11, 2005| |November 4, 2005| |October 28, 2005| |October 18, 2005| |October 14, 2005| |Sept 29, 2005| |Sept 23, 2005| |August 26, 2005| |August 21, 2005| |Jan 29, 2005| |Jan 24, 2005| |Jan 11, 2005| |Jan 3, 2005| |Download| |2004 Back Issues|